Monday, 27 July 2015

You Won’t Believe What Wannabe Cops In Massachusetts Got Additional Points For

The Methuen Police Department in Massachusetts, which reportedly “gave higher points to applicants who said they wouldn’t arrest a family member or an officer they knew” who had been caught engaging in drunken driving.

As a result, job applicants like Michael Phillips, 26, were bypassed.

“The City turned the interview process upside down,” Christopher C. Bowman, chairman of the Massachusetts Civil Service Commission, wrote in Phillip’s case. “There is simply no valid basis to award the highest points to candidates who express a willingness to apply one set of rules to strangers and another set of rules to friends and family members.”
According to The Boston Globe via Jonathan Turley, the department basically rewarded those aspiring cops who were willing to turn the other way in the face of corruption.
What’s even more shocking is the faulty logic they used to defend this stupidity. According to reports, for instance, when Phillip answered that “he would arrest his mother and father if he caught them driving drunk,” he apparently made department officials skeptical.
“This answer appears insincere and sounds like Mr. Phillips is trying to respond in the way he thinks the panel wants him to respond,” a letter regarding the department’s decision not to hire him read.

Furthermore, during a commission hearing, Police Lieutenant Michael Pappalardo (pictured below) bluntly admitted that “he wouldn’t believe anyone who claimed they would arrest their family and friends.” (H/T Photography Is Not A Crime)


This not-so-bright lieutenant seemingly believes that wannabe cops must possess a certain degree of corruption within them.
That makes zero sense whatsoever, but judging by his rhetoric, Pappalardo doesn’t have any common-sense to begin with!

1/5 of the Population of El Salvador and 1/4 of Mexico Now Live in U.S.

We know the illegal immigrant population of in the U.S. has exploded since the 1990s.  We also know it has grown dramatically since President Obama initiated his “open borders” policy to allow just about anyone to come here via the border with Mexico.
The “official” number of illegal aliens in the U.S. stands at 11 million, but now, new evidence suggests that that number is way below the number of those who are actually here.  Gateway Pundit reports:
Lax US border security and civil war in Central America have resulted in a massive influx of Salvadorean immigrants to the United States over the past 30 years.
One-fifth of the population of El Salvador now live in the United States.
Migration Policy reported:
Between 1980 and 1990, the Salvadoran immigrant population in the United States increased nearly fivefold from 94,000 to 465,000. The number of Salvadoran immigrants in the United States continued to grow in the 1990s and 2000s as a result of family reunification and new arrivals fleeing a series of natural disasters that hit El Salvador, including earthquakes and hurricanes.

By 2008, there were about 1.1 million Salvadoran immigrants in the United States. Salvadorans are the country’s sixth largest immigrant group after Mexican, Filipino, Indian, Chinese, and Vietnamese foreign born.

The immigrant population from this tiny Central American country is now nearly as large as the immigrant population from much larger China. (As reference, China’s total population is 200 times larger and its territory is about 500 times larger than El Salvador’s.)
More than half of all Salvadoran immigrants resided in just two states, California and Texas, although they are also concentrated in New York, Maryland, Virginia, and the District of Columbia (for more information on immigrants by state, see the ACS/Census Data tool on the MPI Data Hub)…
…About one of every five Salvadorans resides in the United States.
The 1.1 million Salvadoran immigrants in the United States represent about one-fifth (19.1 percent) of the total population of El Salvador (5.7 million in 2007 according to the Salvadoran Department of Statistics and Censuses).

Friday, 24 July 2015

The CEO of a mental health company in Michigan has been charged with embezzling more than $500,000 of company money to send to a psychic

The criminal case against fired Summit Pointe CEO Erv Brinker rests on what Michigan Attorney General Bill Schuette alleged were fraudulent contracts with a Key West, Fla., man associated with a psychic palm reader.
In a press release after Brinker was arraigned Wednesday on two counts of Medicaid fraud conspiracy and one count of embezzlement by a public official, Schuette said his Health Care Fraud Division’s investigation revealed that “Brinker allegedly sent the $510,000 to a Key West psychic palm reader and her husband under the guise of health care consulting.”
The press release said “As CEO, Brinker had the authority to contractually bind Summit Pointe without Board approval and he allegedly signed the fraudulent contracts without the consultation of other employees. Additionally, Brinker did not notify the Board of Directors of the alleged contracts.”
Before Ingham County District Judge Richard Ball on Wednesday, Brinker, 68, of Delton stood calmly as he was formally charged and his attorneys waived a preliminary examination of the charges. The case was bound over to Ingham County Circuit Court for trial. A pre-trial hearing was set for Aug. 12.
The charges carry maximum penalties of 10 years in jail and a $5,000 fine on conviction.
Brinker attorney Matthew Vicari said the defense has been working with the attorney general’s office “for some months now.”
Assistant Attorney General Jeffrey Schroder told the judge they were close to a plea-bargain agreement with Brinker.
Brinker was released on a $25,000 personal recognizance bond under two conditions named by Schroder and agreed to by the judge:
The first was that he could not have contact with Summit Pointe or its employees.
“Number two,” Schroder said, “That the defendant have no contact with any psychic, fortune-teller or palm reader.”
Tommy Eli of Key West was listed as a Summit Pointe contractor; his name was raised at the Feb. 17 meeting in which Brinker was fired.
At the public hearing, Brinker through his lawyer repeatedly refused to ask questions about Eli, declining to speak unless he was assured the information wouldn’t be used for potential criminal prosecution.
Summit Pointe’s lawyers alleged illusory contract services, saying they were unable to confirm Eli had any professional credentials and that they only found a one-page document as proof of work.
But they did know this: Eli received $510,000 in payments from Summit Pointe. He billed the agency for more than 1,100 hours of work from October 2012 to April 2013, some of which were claimed in invoices to have been conducted in person at Summit Pointe’s offices. The last payment — $265,000 — was sent by overnight courier to a Key West address, marked to the attention of Julie Davis.
The address is a psychic business. Davis is a psychic and tarot card reader, according to a business license filed with the city of Key West.
Eli did not return multiple calls from the Enquirer.
In his press release, Schuette was quoted as saying “Ensuring integrity in our health care system is critical to the safety of all Michigan citizens. Anyone attempting to skirt the law at the expense of patients and taxpayers will be identified and brought to justice. I would like to thank Summit Pointe for bringing this case to our attention and providing assistance and full cooperation to ensure this never happens again.”
After the arraignment, Summit Pointe sent a press release to the Enquirer saying the agency’s leadership and attorneys had worked for months with the Attorney General’s office. 
Board President Trae Allman was quoted in the release as saying, “When our board was informed of employee concerns about irregularities in contracting and expenditures, we engaged Fraser Trebilcock as independent counsel to conduct a careful, external investigation. What we found through that process increasingly disappointed and alarmed us as a board, and among a series of other necessary actions, we contacted the appropriate authorities. We are appreciative of the efforts of the Attorney General, and the Department of Health and Human Services, and we are relieved that this difficult chapter is finally over.”
Summit Pointe’s board fired Brinker for cause, alleging he created a defined-benefits pension plan without board approval and for his own personal benefit. Board members also said Brinker had “apparent  and actual conflicts of interest” with some of the agency’s vendors, and didn’t competitively bid million-dollar contracts that were granted to vendors with whom he had outside business ties. 
 
Brinker’s termination was the result of a nearly three-month internal investigation by Summit Pointe, which hired Lansing-based law firm Fraser Trebilcock Davis and Dunlap to help conduct the probe. Two other Summit Pointe executives — Chief Operating Officer Bob Lambert and Chief Financial Officer Leon Karnovsky — resigned during the investigation.
After Brinker’s dismissal, Summit Pointe has since worked to replace vacancies and rein in finances. The agency has cut off contracts with many vendors named in the lengthy resolution to fire Brinker, and has made changes to its community partnerships, including the discontinuation of running operations as the Custer Greens golf course.
Summit Pointe’s annual audit that was presented to the board in early June revealed weaknesses in financial reporting. Auditors didn’t issue an opinion because they were unable “to obtain sufficient appropriate audit evidence.” They also cited the ongoing investigation.

USA stops United Nations from inspecting its prisons

When U.S. President Barack Obama visited the El Reno Correctional Facility in Oklahoma last week to check on living conditions of prisoners incarcerated there, no one in authority could prevent him from visiting the prison. 
Obama, the first sitting president to visit a federal penitentiary, said “in too many places, black boys and black men, and Latino boys and Latino men experience being treated different under the law.”
The visit itself was described as “unprecedented” and “historic.”
But the United Nations has not been as lucky as the U.S. president was. Several U.N. officials, armed with mandates from the Geneva-based Human Rights Council, have been barred from U.S. penitentiaries which are routinely accused of being steeped in a culture of violence.
Back in 1998, Radhika Coomaraswamy, the U.N. Special Rapporteur on Violence Against Women, was barred from visiting three Michigan prisons to probe sexual misconduct against women prisoners.
Although she had made extensive preparations to interview inmates, Michigan Governor John Engler barred Coomaraswamy on the eve of her proposed visit.
The late Senator Jesse Helms, former chairman of the powerful Senate Foreign Relations Committee, blocked a proposed prison visit by Bacre Waly Ndiaye, head of the U.N. Human Rights Office in New York, who was planning to observe living conditions in some of the U.S. prisons.
Obama’s visit has prompted the United Nations to give another shot at seeking permission to visit the U.S. prison system.
The U.N. Special Rapporteur on torture, Juan E. Méndez, and the Chairperson of the Working Group on Arbitrary Detention, Seong-Phil Hong, have jointly called on the U.S. government to facilitate their requests for an official visit to U.S. prisons to advance criminal justice reform. 
“I look forward to working with the U.S. Department of Justice on the special study commissioned by the President on the need to regulate solitary confinement, which affects 80,000 inmates in the United States, in most cases for periods of months and years,” Méndez said early this week.
“The practice of prolonged or indefinite solitary confinement inflicts pain and suffering of a psychological nature, which is strictly prohibited by the Convention Against Torture,” he said.
“Reform along such lines will have considerable impact not only in the United States but in many countries around the world,” he noted.
Hong, who leads the U.N. Working Group on Arbitrary Detention, said a visit to federal and state institutions “will be an excellent opportunity to discuss with authorities the ‘Basic Principles and Guidelines on the right to anyone deprived of their liberty to bring proceedings before a court’, and to promote its use by the civil society.”
The Working Group has already drafted a set of Principles and Guidelines that “will help establish effective mechanisms to ensure judicial oversight over all situations of deprivation of liberty.”
The document will be considered by the Human Rights Council in September.
According to published reports, there have been charges of unhealthy living conditions and physical beatings, specifically against minorities, including African-Americans and Latin Americans, in the U.S. jail system.
Last month, the administration of New York City Mayor Bill de Blasio and the office of the U.S. Attorney for the Southern District announced far reaching reforms, including the proposed appointment of a Federal Monitor to probe continued prisoner abuses in Riker’s Island, described as the second largest jail system in the United States.
Other measures include restrictions on the use of force by prison guards and the installation of surveillance cameras.
Asked whether U.N. Special Rapporteurs (UNSRs) have previously been permitted into U.S. prisons, Tessa Murphy at Amnesty International (AI), told IPS that Juan Mendez hasn’t visited any U.S. supermaximum facility prisons in his role as UNSR.
He has, however, visited Pelican Bay in California as an expert witness in ongoing litigation there.
She also said AI has called on the U.S. State Department to extend an invite repeatedly requested by the UNSR to visit the United States to examine the use of solitary confinement in federal and state facilities, including through on-site visits.
“AI believes this external scrutiny is particularly important in the case of ‘super-maximum’ security facilities where prisoners are isolated within an already closed environment. We continue to call for this access to be provided.”
She pointed out that AI has released several reports calling for access – based on an extensive body of work on long-term solitary confinement and its damaging effects.
Antonio M. Ginatta, Advocacy Director, U.S. Programme at Human Rights Watch (HRW), told IPS it is a momentous time in the United States as it re-examines and moves to reform its criminal justice system. 
President Obama himself just spoke to the need for this reform, and specifically highlighted the harms caused by solitary confinement.
“Yet the State Department continues to fail to allow the Special Rapporteur on torture access to U.S. confinement facilities to review their use of solitary confinement. It’s as if they missed the President’s speech,” he said.
Ginatta said an invitation to the Special Rapporteur is years overdue.
“In light of the president’s speech and his visit to the El Reno prison, the U.S. Department of State should change course and immediately extend an unrestricted invitation to Special Rapporteur Mendez and the Working Group on Arbitrary Detention,” he declared.
After his prison visit, Obama said: “My goal is that we start seeing some improvements at the federal level and that we’re then able to see states across the country pick up the baton, and there are already some states that leading the way in both sentencing reform as well as prison reform and make sure that we’re seeing what works and build off that.”
Providing details of its meetings with U.S. State Department officials, Amnesty International told IPS that in February it met with Deputy Assistant Secretary Scott Busby in the Bureau of Democracy, Human Rights and Labor and Director William Mozdzierz in the Bureau of International Organization Affairs, Human Rights and Humanitarian Affairs to emphasise the importance of facilitating external scrutiny by the SRT as well as to hand over a petition to the State Department (with over 20,000 signatures, on the same issue.)
AI said SRT Mendez has provided them with a list of prisons he wishes to visit, including in Louisiana, California, Arizona, Pennsylvania, New York, and the Federal Bureau of Prisons.
Secretary Mozdzierz, stressed to AI that the State Department has a strong national interest in ensuring that the United States lives up to international treaty obligations.
Deputy Assistant Secretary Scott Busby emphasised how committed the U.S. government is in providing access for the SRT.
However, Secretary Mozdzierz emphasised that access to state prisons is dependent on the individual governors and state Attorney Generals being amenable, and there are no mechanisms by which the State Department can ensure a positive response.

Saturday, 18 July 2015

Civil-Liberties Groups Sue TSA Over Body-Scanner Rules – There Are None

Everyone’s favorite government agency is being sued by an alliance of three civil-liberties groups in a lawsuit filed in the U.S. Court of Appeals in D.C., Wednesday.
 The Competitive Enterprise Institute, the National Center for Transgender Equality, and theRutherford Institute say the rules governing how the TSA can utilize its controversial body scanning technology are nonexistent.
“There is no regulation controlling the use of body scanners right now,” the Competitive Enterprise Institute‘s Marc Scribner said. “TSA has been using scanners the last seven years but that entire span of time they’ve been operating without a[ny] regulation.”
The groups say the TSA has run roughshod over federal law and court orders in order to shield its scanning practices from the public, and are asking the court to force the agency to propose a system of regulations within three months.
“We are the unwitting victims of a system so corrupt that those who stand up for the rule of law and aspire to transparency in government are in the minority,” John Whitehead of theRutherford Institute said. “This corruption is so vast it spans all branches of government, from the power-hungry agencies under the executive branch and the corporate puppets within the legislative branch…”
“Body imaging scanners are a perfect example of this collusion between corporate lobbyists and government officials,” Whitehead says. “At a minimum, the TSA should be required to establish rules governing the use and deployment of these scanners and have those regulations vetted by the public.”
The lawsuit would require all TSA proposals to be subject to public comment and expert evaluation before implementation.
Last year, an undercover inspector general investigation found that scanners and agents missed banned items, including explosives, 95 percent of the time.
The suit comes only a month after the agency was disgraced again by its almost-total failurein a covert security audit.
In response, Homeland Security Secretary Jeh Johnson has ordered the agency to pursue an improvement plan that will require a greater security crackdown meaning longer wait times for travelers. The measures will include more hand-wanding, more use of bomb-sniffing dogs and more random testing of luggage and travelers for traces of explosives.
The lawsuit is the latest filing in a lengthy court battle since the TSA first began deploying the machines in 2007. The agency has installed 740 body-scanners across 160 airports nationwide.
In 2011, the same federal appeals court ruled in an earlier case involving the Electronic Privacy Information Center that the TSA needed to develop rules for body-scanners under theAdministrative Procedure Act, but though the agency proposed ideas in 2013, it has not followed through.
The civil-liberties groups are asking that this prior ruling be enforced.

Retired General: Drones Create More Terrorists Than They Kill, Iraq War Helped Create ISIS

Retired Army Gen. Mike Flynn, a top intelligence official in the post-9/11 wars in Iraq and Afghanistan, says in a forthcoming interview on Al Jazeera English that the drone war is creating more terrorists than it is killing. He also asserts that the U.S. invasion of Iraq helped create the Islamic State and that U.S. soldiers involved in torturing detainees need to be held legally accountable for their actions.
Flynn, who in 2014 was forced out as head of the Defense Intelligence Agency, has in recent months become an outspoken critic of the Obama administration’s Middle East strategy, calling for a more hawkish approach to the Islamic State and Iran.
But his enthusiasm for the application of force doesn’t extend to the use of drones. In the interview with Al Jazeera presenter Mehdi Hasan, set to air July 31, the former three star general says: “When you drop a bomb from a drone … you are going to cause more damage than you are going to cause good.” Pressed by Hasan as to whether drone strikes are creating more terrorists than they kill, Flynn says, “I don’t disagree with that.” He describes the present approach of drone warfare as “a failed strategy.”
“What we have is this continued investment in conflict,” the retired general says. “The more weapons we give, the more bombs we drop, that just … fuels the conflict.”
Prior to serving as director of the Defense Intelligence Agency, Flynn was director of Intelligence for the Joint Special Operations Command (JSOC) during the wars in Iraq and Afghanistan. During his time in Iraq, Flynn is credited with helping to transform JSOC into an intelligence-driven special forces operation, tailored to fight the insurgency in that country. Flynn was in Iraq during the peak of the conflict there, as intelligence chief to Stanley McChrystal, former general and head of JSOC. When questioned about how many Iraqis JSOC operatives had killed inside the country during his tenure, Flynn would later say, “Thousands, I don’t even know how many.”
In the upcoming interview, Flynn says that the invasion of Iraq was a strategic mistake that directly contributed to the rise of the extremist group the Islamic State. “We definitely put fuel on a fire,” he told Hasan. “Absolutely … there’s no doubt, I mean … history will not be kind to the decisions that were made certainly in 2003.”
Over his 33 years in the Army, Flynn developed a reputation as an iconoclast. In 2010, he published a controversial report on intelligence operations in Afghanistan, stating in part that the military could not answer “fundamental questions” about the country and its people despite nearly a decade of engagement there. Earlier this year, Flynn commended the Senate Intelligence Committee report on CIA torture, saying that torture had eroded American values and that in time, the U.S. “will look back on it, and it won’t be a pretty picture.”
He echoed these statements in his Al Jazeera appearance. Before his tenure at JSOC, operatives of the force had already become notorious for operating secretive prison facilities in Iraq where the torture of detainees had become routine. In his interview, Flynn denied any personal role in these abuses, while calling for accountability for U.S. soldiers who had been responsible. “You know I hope that as more and more information comes out that people are held accountable,” Flynn says. “History is not going to look kind on those actions … and we will be held, we should be held accountable for many, many years to come.”

Tuesday, 14 July 2015

Germany encourages pedophilies to sign up for confidential treatment, even if they have abused a child, and doctors are hailing it as a success.

Some men who are sexually attracted to children would like help to change their condition but fear doctors will tell the police. In Germany, though, a campaign is under way to persuade them to sign up for confidential treatment, even if they have abused a child - and doctors are hailing it as a big success.
Max is a science graduate, in his early thirties. Articulate, with a ready smile and an infectious laugh. He could be your neighbour, your work colleague or your sister's new boyfriend. A nice guy. An average bloke. Except he's also a paedophile.
Max is sexually attracted to pre-pubescent girls — typically between the ages of six and 11. It's an urge that for years filled him with self-loathing and despair.
"I would see a girl, and I would undress the girl in my mind, and it was just disgusting, and I'd say to myself: 'Stop this.' And it just wouldn't stop. I had feelings of disgust and fear," he says.
Max has never abused a child sexually, nor does he consume child pornography — itself a form of indirect abuse, because children are usually involved in its production. In fact Max is just one of many people who feel an attraction to children, but who are determined not to act on it.
They are sometimes called celibate or "virtuous" paedophiles. The word "paedophilia" describes the sexual attraction, not the abuse itself, so not all paedophiles are child abusers - and not all child abusers are paedophiles, experts say, since abuse sometimes has other root causes.
Celibate paedophiles are a hidden segment of the population. They have never committed an offence, so are unknown to the police. And because of the taboo - and the fear of violence from people who think they are child abusers - they usually keep their attraction secret. 
It's a much bigger group than you might think. Recent research suggests that between 3% and 5% of men, from all social and economic backgrounds, could be sexually attracted to children. Some are attracted only to girls. Others only to boys. Others to both. And some are also attracted to adults.
"I don't have greasy hair, pebble glasses and wear tatty clothes," writes Max in a book he has published to help other paedophiles who don't want to abuse children. "There is no such thing as the typical paedophile which people imagine. We are all different, and completely normal people. The only thing we all have in common is a sexual attraction to children… I am learning to control the sexual side of my feelings."
He's doing that partly thanks to a radical treatment for paedophiles called the Dunkelfeld Prevention Project, which is in operation at 11 different centres across Germany.

 

For a year he attended group therapy, three hours every week.
"It was very painful," he tells me. "It was about getting to know a side of myself that I had hidden, a side that I didn't like to think about. It's painful to acknowledge that you are a paedophile. It was like standing in front of a mirror, and on the one hand thinking: 'What kind of a monster are you?' But it was also very healthy to stand in front of the mirror and say: 'I'm a paedophile, but that's OK, I won't do anything bad.' 
"A very important thing is acceptance. To be able to think and feel that paedophilia is a part of me, but it's not what defines me. My actions are what define me."
The treatment is a form of cognitive behavioural therapy which analyses past sexual behaviour and feelings, in order to come up with strategies to avoid potentially abusive situations in the future. Some practical advice is very simple, such as never being alone with a child. Other tactics are more complicated, and involve changing attitudes, for example helping the patient to grasp that sexual contact with children can never be consensual.
Controversially, the treatment is also available for men who have abused children in the past — even if that abuse has gone unreported.
So what does a therapist do if a patient says he has abused a child?
"If he comes to us and says, 'I have done something illegal in the past and don't want to do it again,' and that's the normal case for us, then we can help him to build up his self-regulatory behaviour to not do that again," says clinical psychologist and sexologist Anna Konrad of the Charite hospital in Berlin.
But surely, I suggest, it's difficult to sit opposite a man who has abused children and try to help him?
"The main aim of the project is to protect children from being abused, and if I can help the person not to do that again, then for me it's quite clear that I should do that," she says.
In Germany, therapists are not only not obliged to report past abuse to the authorities, it is illegal to violate the principle of patient confidentiality - unlike in Britain, where therapists have a duty to report.
The British approach makes it extremely difficult to treat someone properly, Konrad says. The past behaviour of abusers can't be analysed effectively, and paedophiles rarely come forward for treatment in the first place because of the fear of arrest - if they have committed a crime they are right to be afraid, and even if they haven't they may still consider it too risky.
Max agrees with this.
"A treatment like this can prevent the first offence. Criminalisation — if it works very, very well, and it usually doesn't — can only prevent the second offence," he says.
More than 430 men have started the treatment. And because of a lack of places, there are long waiting lists. Since it was first set up in 2005 more than 5,350 people have contacted the network for advice or to find out more about the therapy. Anna Konrad says patients are asked to fill in a questionnaire at the start of the treatment and at the end - and that a comparison of the two suggests the success rate is good.